logo
Kurashizu Blogwhere ideas flow
  • Home
  • News
  • Blog
  • About
  • Home
  • News
  • Blog
  • About

© 2026 Kurashizu. All rights reserved.

Admin·New Post·Service Status
Powered by Cloudflare·07.11.26
← Back to news

A partial digestion of the HRT counterexample

Original article
terrytao.wordpress.com|13 points|1 comments|by ijustlovemath|Aug 9, 2026

A Partial Digestion of the HRT Counterexample

Originally discussed by Terence Tao on August 6, 2026, regarding recent breakthroughs in time-frequency analysis.

Introduction to Time-Frequency Shifts

In the study of functions of a single variable, we can manipulate a function f(t)f(t)f(t) using two primary operations:

  1. Spatial Translation: Shifting the function in space.
  2. Frequency Modulation: Shifting the function in frequency.

When combined, these create a time-frequency shift, denoted as π(x,ω)\pi(x, \omega)π(x,ω). While this is essentially a piece of the Weyl representation of the Heisenberg group, we can define it simply as:

π(x,ω)f(t):=e2πiωtf(t−x)\pi(x, \omega) f(t) := e^{2\pi i \omega t} f(t-x)π(x,ω)f(t):=e2πiωtf(t−x)

Certain functions exhibit linear dependencies among these shifts. For example, consider a sinusoid: f(t) = A sin(kt + phi) This function satisfies the relation: π(πk,0)f+f=0\pi\left(\frac{\pi}{k}, 0\right) f + f = 0π(kπ​,0)f+f=0


The HRT Conjecture

The Heil-Ramanathan-Topiwala (HRT) conjecture posits that such linear relations are impossible if the function fff possesses sufficient decay.

Conjecture 1 (HRT): If fff is a non-zero function, there is no linear relation of the form: ∑k=1Nckπ(xk,ωk)f=0\sum_{k=1}^N c_k \pi(x_k, \omega_k) f = 0∑k=1N​ck​π(xk​,ωk​)f=0 where the points (xk,ωk)(x_k, \omega_k)(xk​,ωk​) are distinct and the coefficients ckc_kck​ are not all zero.

A particularly challenging version of this conjecture focused on the case where fff is a Schwartz function (smooth and rapidly decaying).

Previous Partial Results

Before the recent counterexample, several positive results were established:

  • Linnell's Result: The conjecture holds if the points (xk,ωk)(x_k, \omega_k)(xk​,ωk​) reside within a translate of a discrete subgroup of R2\mathbb{R}^2R2. This covers all cases where N=3N=3N=3.
  • Bownik and Speegle: The conjecture holds if fff exhibits a "super-exponential" decay rate.

The HRT conjecture was long thought to be true for all Schwartz functions.


The Counterexample

Recently, Faulhuber, Petersen, van Velthoven, and Voigtlaender successfully resolved the conjecture by proving it false, even for the Schwartz class.

Theorem 2: There exists a non-zero Schwartz function fff and distinct points (xk,ωk)(x_k, \omega_k)(xk​,ωk​) with coefficients ckc_kck​ (not all zero) such that: ∑k=1Nckπ(xk,ωk)f=0\sum_{k=1}^N c_k \pi(x_k, \omega_k) f = 0∑k=1N​ck​π(xk​,ωk​)f=0

Analysis of the Result

The authors utilized AI to assist in their discovery. Tao notes that this was done responsibly: the final proofs were hand-written, the methodology was transparent, and the results were verified via independent numerical checks.

FeaturePrevious Positive ResultsThe New Counterexample
Number of Points (NNN)N=3N=3N=3N=4N=4N=4
Point DistributionDiscrete subgroup translatesTranslate of a discrete subgroup
Function DecaySuper-exponentialSchwartz (Rapidly decaying)
AnalyticityOften assumed/requiredNot analytic

COVID Graphic


Technical Breakdown of the Proof

The proof strategy can be visualized as a sequence of transformations to turn a functional equation into a solvable algebraic problem:

1. The Setup

By setting N=4N=4N=4 and choosing points in a translate of the discrete subgroup Z2\mathbb{Z}^2Z2 by an irrational shift α\alphaα, the problem becomes an eigenvalue problem.

2. The Zak Transform

Normally, one would use the standard Zak transform for a lattice Z2\mathbb{Z}^2Z2. However, scalar quasiperiodic functions with mean zero must have zeroes, creating topological obstacles. To bypass this, the authors used a denser lattice Z2×Z2\mathbb{Z}^2 \times \mathbb{Z}^2Z2×Z2, employing a vector-valued Zak transform taking values in C2\mathbb{C}^2C2.

3. The Vector Cocycle

The problem is transformed into a "vector cocycle problem": v(x + alpha) = M(x)v(x) Where:

  • vvv is a non-zero smooth quasiperiodic vector-valued function.
  • α\alphaα is an irrational shift.
  • M(x)M(x)M(x) is a matrix-valued function based on the chosen points and coefficients.

4. Approximation and Contraction

The authors sought a scenario where M(x)M(x)M(x) behaves like a rank-one function. While an exact match is impossible, they used AI-assisted guesswork and numerical computation to find parameters where: ∥M(x)−rank-one function∥≈0.99\| M(x) - \text{rank-one function} \| \approx 0.99∥M(x)−rank-one function∥≈0.99 Since this operator norm is <1< 1<1, they could apply a contraction mapping argument to solve a variant of the equation: Solve: v(x+α)=M(x)v(x)+ϵ(x)\text{Solve: } v(x+\alpha) = M(x)v(x) + \epsilon(x)Solve: v(x+α)=M(x)v(x)+ϵ(x)

5. The Small Divisor Problem

The final step involves solving a scalar cocycle equation: f(x + alpha) = g(x)f(x) The standard approach is:

  1. Take the logarithm.
  2. Apply a Fourier transform.
  3. Divide by the multiplier associated with the shift.

This introduces the "small divisor" problem, common in dynamical systems like the KAM theorem. If α\alphaα is too close to a rational vector, the division becomes unstable.

Summary Checklist for the Counterexample

  • Non-zero function fff
  • fff is in the Schwartz class
  • N=4N=4N=4 distinct points
  • Coefficients ckc_kck​ are not all zero
  • Linear relation ∑ckπ(xk,ωk)f=0\sum c_k \pi(x_k, \omega_k) f = 0∑ck​π(xk​,ωk​)f=0 is satisfied