logo
Kurashizu Blogwhere ideas flow
  • Home
  • News
  • Blog
  • About
  • Home
  • News
  • Blog
  • About

© 2026 Kurashizu. All rights reserved.

Admin·New Post·Service Status
Powered by Cloudflare·04.11.26
← Back to news

It’s so hard to finish an idea that is not yours and is just suggested by AI

Original article
ssp.sh|62 points|30 comments|by zazuke|Aug 26, 2026

Guarding Your Digital Garden: Why AI Doesn't Belong in Your Obsidian Vault

Many users are currently integrating AI into Obsidian, driven by the desire for peak productivity. The appeal is obvious: because Obsidian stores notes locally in Markdown—an open, accessible format—it is the perfect playground for AI agents.

However, while the technical capability exists, the philosophical cost is high.

Technical Optimizations & Warnings

If you insist on using Vibe Code Agents within your vault, I highly recommend utilizing the Obsidian CLI. It is significantly more efficient for searching, retrieving files, or performing grep operations than standard interfaces.

That said, I strongly advise against flooding your vault with AI-generated text or extensive summaries.

The Danger of "AI Slop"

When you allow an AI to write your notes, you introduce "noise" into your system. Over time, the boundary between your original insights and synthetic text blurs.

Note TypeValueLong-term Utility
Human-WrittenHigh (Contains conviction/emotion)Permanent Insight
AI-GeneratedLow (Average/Generic)Temporary Convenience
HybridVariableDepends on curation

Using AI to summarize everything →\rightarrow→ Actually reading and synthesizing.

The Problem with Automated Summaries

While a quick summary seems helpful in the moment, I find them consistently mediocre upon review. They fail to highlight the specific nuances that I find important, meaning I usually have to reread the source material anyway.

"A summary of a PDF is noise." — Kepano

My Compromise Workflow

When using the Obsidian Webclipper, I occasionally allow a one-sentence summary. To ensure I don't mistake this for my own thought in five years, I follow these rules:

  1. Clearly label it as AI-generated.
  2. Wrap the text in a blockquote.
  3. If (My Thoughts Added)  ⟹  Delete AI Paragraphs\text{If (My Thoughts Added)} \implies \text{Delete AI Paragraphs}If (My Thoughts Added)⟹Delete AI Paragraphs.

The Architecture of Thought

AI is excellent for advanced research—such as discovering related notes—but it should be banned from tagging and organization.

If an AI builds your connections, those links are meaningless because they didn't emerge from your own cognitive process. The true power of a "Second Brain" is the deliberate construction of a knowledge graph.

Privacy and Local Models

Due to the sensitivity of my data, I avoid cloud uploads. I prefer using local models via the Graph Analysis plugin or Obsidian Smart Connections.

The Risk: If you outsource your note-taking to AI, you lose clarity. You will likely find the vault devoid of value and eventually abandon it entirely.

Search as an Organizational Strategy

If you want to experiment with AI clustering or complex queries, do it in a separate vault or a dedicated database like DuckDB.

My primary vault contains 25,979 files (approx. 3.5 GB). Despite the size, I can locate any piece of information in milliseconds using the Omnisearch plugin. Search is not a technical hurdle; it is an organizational one. Whether you use Zettelkasten or a Memex-style system, the goal is retrieval.

The Future: Notes as Prompts

We must remember that our current notes will serve as the libraries or prompts for the AI of tomorrow. However, this is only useful if the notes are original.

Cultivating Human Knowledge

I am interested in cultivating knowledge for myself, not for a machine. If we stop thinking for ourselves, we will all end up with the same "average" knowledge base—devoid of decision-making or conviction.

Knowledge Value=∫(Human Experience+Critical Thinking) dt\text{Knowledge Value} = \int (\text{Human Experience} + \text{Critical Thinking}) \, dtKnowledge Value=∫(Human Experience+Critical Thinking)dt

We desperately need human-curated knowledge on a massive scale because AI models will eventually starve if they only train on synthetic, "fake" data. We simply need an economic model that rewards the actual creators of these insights.

Final Thoughts: The Process is the Point

Using an agent like Claude Code to build your system means it isn't your system.

  • Use AI for retrieval/search.
  • Use AI for thinking/connecting.

As noted in the discussion Obsidian vs Claude, a second brain is a system. The act of writing and linking isn't an "inefficiency" to be optimized away; it is the actual process of learning. As the CEO of Obsidian suggests, it's not about the app—it's about the files and the thoughts they contain.

If the thoughts aren't yours, the vault is empty.