logo
Kurashizu Blogwhere ideas flow
  • Home
  • News
  • Blog
  • About
  • Home
  • News
  • Blog
  • About

© 2026 Kurashizu. All rights reserved.

Admin·New Post·Service Status
Powered by Cloudflare·30.10.26
← Back to news

Making chicken transparent using Dorito dust

Original article
chillphysicsenjoyer.substack.com|150 points|46 comments|by crescit_eundo|Oct 17, 2026

Making Chicken Transparent Using Dorito Dust

By Casual Physics Enjoyer | Oct 17, 2026

"Thank you Adaobi for such a wonderful suggestion."

My brilliant friend, Adaobi Adibe, shared a fascinating research paper regarding the process of rendering biological tissues transparent.

In the study titled “Achieving optical transparency in live animals with absorbing molecules,” the researchers demonstrated that biological tissues—specifically chicken breast—could be made transparent by immersing them in a solution of tartrazine.

The "Dorito" Connection

For those unfamiliar, tartrazine is the vivid yellowish-orange food coloring commonly found in Doritos. To test this, I decided to replicate portions of the protocol using chicken breast and tartrazine.

Dorito Dust Source


🧪 Experimental Phase 1: The Warm-Up

I began by soaking a chicken breast slice in a ~0.19 M tartrazine solution for 6 hours at room temperature. I used a sample approximately 2mm thick (cut from a 5mm slice).

Observations:

  • Texture: Remained the same to the touch.
  • Visuals: The chicken acquired a translucent, gummy-bear-like quality.
  • Transparency: Partial, though not as complete as the results in the original paper.

I wanted to follow the paper's exact protocol →\rightarrow→ The original paper utilized 0.62 M0.62\text{ M}0.62 M at 40 °C40\text{ °C}40 °C with a machine shaker, but I lacked the equipment and a way to perform this safely.

Comparison

As seen above, the sample on the left (treated) shows some transparency—the 5mm×5mm5\text{mm} \times 5\text{mm}5mm×5mm grid is visible through the tissue. The sample on the right is the water control (slightly yellow due to accidental dust contamination). It honestly looks appetizing enough to chew, if not for the risk of Salmonella.

Cartoon of Tartrazine


🔬 The Science of Transparency

The prevailing theory is that the absorbance properties of tartrazine modify the refractive index of water. By aligning the refractive index of the water with that of the lipid and protein solutions in the tissue, light scattering is reduced, making the object transparent.

Solution Preparation

Because the dye powder is only 80%80\%80% pure, there is some uncertainty regarding the exact molar concentration. I prepared three variations:

Tartrazine (g)Tap Water (g)w/w %Molality (mol/kg)Tartrazine (mmol)Approx. Molarity
0 g0\text{ g}0 g20 g20\text{ g}20 g0%0\%0%0000000 M (Control)0\text{ M (Control)}0 M (Control)
2 g2\text{ g}2 g18 g18\text{ g}18 g10%10\%10%0.210.210.213.73.73.7∼0.19 M\sim 0.19\text{ M}∼0.19 M
6 g6\text{ g}6 g14 g14\text{ g}14 g30%30\%30%0.800.800.8011.211.211.2∼0.56 M\sim 0.56\text{ M}∼0.56 M

Calculation Note: The molar mass of Tartrazine is M=534.4 g/molM = 534.4\text{ g/mol}M=534.4 g/mol. Since the powder is 80%80\%80% dye, true values may be ∼15%\sim 15\%∼15% lower.

Solutions

Material Specifications

The dye used had the following properties:

  • Molecular Formula: C16H9N4Na3O9S2\text{C}_{16}\text{H}_9\text{N}_4\text{Na}_3\text{O}_9\text{S}_2C16​H9​N4​Na3​O9​S2​
  • Molecular Weight: 534.37 g/mol534.37\text{ g/mol}534.37 g/mol
  • λmax\lambda_{\text{max}}λmax​ (in water): 425 nm425\text{ nm}425 nm
  • Dye Content: 80%80\%80%
  • Water-insoluble matter: 0.20%0.20\%0.20%
  • Heavy metals (as Pb): 40 mg/kg40\text{ mg/kg}40 mg/kg

Chemical Specs


🛠️ The Process

Experimental Checklist:

  • Use jeweler's scale for precision.
  • Mix at room temperature.
  • Skip gloves (FDA food safe/no odor).

Chicken Slices

Results: 6-Hour Soak

6 Hour Results

  1. High Concentration (∼0.56 M\sim 0.56\text{ M}∼0.56 M): Failed. The tartrazine appeared to crystallize.
  2. Medium Concentration (∼0.19 M\sim 0.19\text{ M}∼0.19 M): Success. The chicken looked gelatinous.

🔄 Second Attempt: 12-Hour Soak

I decided to extend the soaking time to 12 hours at room temperature. To avoid the crystallization issue, I omitted the high-concentration solution and focused on the control and the ∼0.19 M\sim 0.19\text{ M}∼0.19 M solution.

Safety Adjustment: I placed the chicken in covered test tubes since they were sitting out for a longer duration.

12 Hour Results

Outcome: While difficult to capture on camera, there was a slight increase in visible translucency compared to the control.


🔭 Broader Implications

This technique is primarily used to facilitate fluorescence imaging in living animals. For the independent scientist, mastering this could open doors to:

  • Probing internal biological structures at home.
  • Obtaining higher-quality images of tissue architecture.
  • Reducing the cost of effective observation.

This aligns with my broader research goals. For instance:

  1. I previously developed tracing software for Brownian particles using my own microscope.
  2. I am currently exploring ways to match CO2\text{CO}_2CO2​ gas sensing performance using pressure to lower costs.

Research Context


📚 Appendix: Optical Transparency Theory

If you want to dive deeper into why things are opaque, here are the two primary causes:

1. Absorption

Light rays are absorbed as they pass through a material. If the light is absorbed, it never reaches the eye. The specific wavelengths absorbed depend on the material's spectra.

2. Scattering

Light is "scrambled" due to differences in refractive indices between different components of the material.

Transparency Diagram