logo
Kurashizu Blogwhere ideas flow
  • Home
  • News
  • Blog
  • About
  • Home
  • News
  • Blog
  • About

© 2026 Kurashizu. All rights reserved.

Admin·New Post·Service Status
Powered by Cloudflare·30.10.26
← Back to news

It's still OK to enjoy programming

Original article
chriskiehl.com|144 points|147 comments|by goostavos|Oct 17, 2026

The Joy of Coding Still Exists

Reading through Hacker News lately has convinced me that a reminder is necessary: it is still perfectly acceptable to enjoy the act of programming.

The Shift in Perspective

We have to acknowledge that the landscape has shifted. In a professional environment—where the primary goal is generating business value—the financial logic behind writing every line of code by hand has evolved.

ContextPrimary DriverCurrent State
ProfessionalEconomic ValueShift toward AI-assisted efficiency
PersonalIntellectual JoyPurely about the experience

The most audible voices online tend to be the most miserable, and their pessimism is inevitable infectious.

Finding Pleasure in the Process

To offer a small rebuttal to the prevailing sea of despair: I still spend my weekends programming simply because it is fun.

Currently, my "masterpiece" is a Breakout clone. It is far from perfect:

  • Basic game loop
  • Reliable collision detection (currently terrible)
  • Polished graphics
// A glimpse into my "buggy" collision logic
if (ball.x > paddle.x && ball.x < paddle.x + paddle.width) {
    // This probably doesn't work half the time
    ball.velocityY *= -1; 
}

I embrace the struggle of solving these problems because that friction is exactly what makes me happy. It is irrelevant that Claude could generate a perfect version in a single prompt; the goal isn't the finished product, but the act of creation.

Intellectual Exploration

Sometimes, I wander away from my game to dive into obscure technical rabbit holes. For instance, I recently spent a weekend investigating how to maximize type safety in Java by borrowing concepts from dependently typed languages like Agda.

I categorize these diversions as "interesting ways to conceptualize a problem." While I might not immediately grasp the full utility of these ideas, I've found that the most elegant programming concepts often require years of "baking" in the mind before they truly click.

I am writing this because I feel an increasing, strange social pressure—a suggestion that there is no longer any point, or any joy, in continuing to evolve as a human being.

The more you immerse yourself in the "doom stream," the more it begins to warp your outlook.

The Balance of Tools

To be clear, I am not against the new tools. I actually love "vibe-coding." I have a whole collection of applications where I have never actually read a single line of the underlying code.

However, my deeper studies serve a different purpose. I want to equip myself with more tools for reasoning about program correctness algebraically—a subject I explore in my book. This involves treating code as a mathematical expression, perhaps similar to:

Correctness≈∫inputoutputLogic(dx)\text{Correctness} \approx \int_{input}^{output} \text{Logic}(dx)Correctness≈∫inputoutput​Logic(dx)